| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Fredo Administrative Moderator
Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Posts: 8164 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:13 pm Post subject: Loudness War - New Foundation |
|
|
Friedemann Tischmeyer, mastering engineer and author of books about audio mixing and mastering, has started a foundation, trying to improve the quality of music albums.
The issue is that music gets louder and louder, with less dynamic range, which means less emotion and expression. There's no issue with some albums being mastered really loud, yet many albums could have been a lot better if they weren’t over compressed.
If you’re remotely interested, please take a look at the website and sign up. It’s free and it takes only a minute or 2. It is valid both for music industry people as well as regular listeners who enjoy listening to well mixed and mastered music. The website is both in the German and English language.
http://dynamicrange.de/
All the best, and thank you for reading, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
brandy Senior Member
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 2498 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dynamic range is way too overrated these days... Only NO Dynamic is GOOD Dynamic. _________________ Christoph Brandes | Iguana Studios | Freiburg/Germany | Nuendo 3.1.1.944 | System Specs | originaly registered in deepest 2001 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jean-Michel Bocéno Member
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 653 Location: France
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When there is no dynamic, there's no dynamic issue...
I signed up of course.
JM _________________ Nuendo 5 | W7 Pro 32 | ASUS P5-Q Deluxe | Intel Quad Q9550 | 4GB DDR2 | SSL Madixtrem | UAD-1 & UAD-2 | SSL Alphalink Madi AX | MCU |
| MacBook Pro | Digi 002 Rack |
| Two ears | |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neil Wilkes Grand Senior Member
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 4172 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good thing too.
One question about the DR meter - will this be a multichannel one or just stereo?
The overcompression/excessive Peak Limiting thing is creeping into surround as well, and it's awful. _________________ XP Pro SP2, Nuendo 5.x, 4.3.0 & 3.2.1, DD & DTS, Surround Edition, WK-ID Controller, 3x UAD-1, MLP Lossless, DTS-HD, ES & 96/24, DPL II, SSL ProConvert, Sonic DVD-A Creator, Sonic Scenarist yada etc.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tank Junior Member
Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Posts: 93 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| brandy wrote: | | Dynamic range is way too overrated these days... Only NO Dynamic is GOOD Dynamic. |
I trust you are being sarcastic?
T _________________ Nuendo 4.2.2| Dual Quad Xeon 3.2 | Intel Chipset | 16Gb Ram | SATA 300 Audio, Video and Sample Storage Drives x 6| NVdia Quadra Graphics | LCD Monitors x 4 | SSL Mixtreme & Mixpander Powerpack Soundcards | UAD-1 x 2 | Midex 8. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Musicbynumbers Member
Joined: 10 Nov 2007 Posts: 193 Location: Brighton, UK
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i tried too :(
got an error, waiting for someone to get back to me :)
but it is a very good cause! _________________ Nuendo 4.2 asus p5w dh, q6600 @2.66ghz, 4 gig ddr2, raid 10 (internal), ati x1900 + ati x1300 (1 main lcd + 3x8inch touchscreens). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leon EA Member
Joined: 14 Feb 2009 Posts: 242 Location: Hamburg - Germany
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Neil Wilkes wrote: | Good thing too.
One question about the DR meter - will this be a multichannel one or just stereo?
The overcompression/excessive Peak Limiting thing is creeping into surround as well, and it's awful. | Good point, but I'm sure Friedemann has been thinking about that as well. I can imagine it requires a lot more work and a lot more funding... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Derek Senior Member
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 1542
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the loudness war is going to end. but its not going to happen because people stop the insanity or because of some
well meant campaign such as this one (or the 34964322 ones before it), its gonna happen because of technology
advancement.
already now, most music is listened to via media players, at least in genres where the loudness
race is an issue at all. these media players, one after another, will start to adopt the technology to analyse tracks
in their playlist in advance. piece of cake for todays computers, hey, my mobile phone can do it too already.
the at times *extreme* volume jumps are something very annoying for the consumer, and its an issue even
joe average notices and cares about when its disturbing his enjoyment of random playlists through his downloaded
music collection. i would guess that at the latest with the new OS generation, the OSses default players will have
the needed tech to be able to playback tracks at properly "equalized" RMS levels, and theres a good chance that it will be activated by default.
meaning, this technology will cover the majority of the market pretty soon, without the end users having to do anything at all about it.
and THAT will lead to the loud masterers nightmare where all tracks are played back at the same RMS level
and the only difference will be that, the louder you master, the more whimpy your track appears in the RMS levelled
playlist.
and when that has happened, THEN the loudness war will finally be over. a couple more years maybe. im pretty optimistic
that the technological advancement will come a lot sooner (in fact its already in place in many media players), it
will just take a few years until the majority of audio engineers realize these new circumstances and react accordingly.
anyway, this will be the reason why the loudness war will end eventually. it will not end because of people acting like grown ups. there are not enough
grown ups in this industry for that to happen ;-) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zolo Senior Member
Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Posts: 2262 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Derek wrote: | the loudness war is going to end. but its not going to happen because people stop the insanity or because of some
well meant campaign such as this one (or the 34964322 ones before it), its gonna happen because of technology
advancement.
already now, most music is listened to via media players, at least in genres where the loudness
race is an issue at all. these media players, one after another, will start to adopt the technology to analyse tracks
in their playlist in advance. piece of cake for todays computers, hey, my mobile phone can do it too already.
the at times *extreme* volume jumps are something very annoying for the consumer, and its an issue even
joe average notices and cares about when its disturbing his enjoyment of random playlists through his downloaded
music collection. i would guess that at the latest with the new OS generation, the OSses default players will have
the needed tech to be able to playback tracks at properly "equalized" RMS levels, and theres a good chance that it will be activated by default.
meaning, this technology will cover the majority of the market pretty soon, without the end users having to do anything at all about it.
and THAT will lead to the loud masterers nightmare where all tracks are played back at the same RMS level
and the only difference will be that, the louder you master, the more whimpy your track appears in the RMS levelled
playlist.
and when that has happened, THEN the loudness war will finally be over. a couple more years maybe. im pretty optimistic
that the technological advancement will come a lot sooner (in fact its already in place in many media players), it
will just take a few years until the majority of audio engineers realize these new circumstances and react accordingly.
anyway, this will be the reason why the loudness war will end eventually. it will not end because of people acting like grown ups. there are not enough
grown ups in this industry for that to happen ;-) |
It sounds to me you're missing the point entirely. This isn't about normalizing playback volumes.
Nothing in normalization/compression/limiting will add dynamics where none existed originally.
No device can properly restore dynamic range crushed in mixing/mastering.
This entire concept of returning to the use of dynamics in audio (pre-1986) must be an industry wide focus re-sold to the consumer as the latest improvement in dynamic digital technology or it will never happen.
When the dynamics in modern music is restored to create the level of impact that a 70's Supertramp album contains, we'll be on track.
Alot of it starts with musicians who write songs (*and can play them live) that have dynamics in the first place.
Listen to the live Deep Purple or Rainbow album from the 70's... hard rock/metal with mood and dynamics. _________________ • N5 w/NEK • DD/SE • RME HDSP9652 • HDSPe Madi • Micstasy M • Asus P5Q • Q9300 • 4GB DDR2 • UAD2 Quad • Win XP/32 • Win7/64 • Custom RME TotalMix Skins |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Derek Senior Member
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 1542
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| zolo wrote: |
It sounds to me you're missing the point entirely. |
nope. you missed my point. maybe i didnt make myself clear enough (always possible when speaking in a foreign language)
so let me elaborate just a bit more:
| zolo wrote: |
This isn't about normalizing playback volumes. |
no, but the loudness war has always ultimately been about playback volumes, or more specifically, about gaining
a perceived level advantage in an AB-situation (as in: "my CD is louder/more fat than yours"), i.e. having your
track stick out on a compilation record, appear louder on the radio (in addition to the loudness wars between the radio stations
themselves, leading to the grotesque scenario of dynamic free masters running through the radio stations optimod processors trying to
squeeze even more perceived volume out of them and failing miserably to do so of course).
the gamble of the loudness war has always been that you sacrifice a certain amount of dynamics (more and
more with each year) in return for the faint possibility of your recording coming across a little "louder".
heres where my prediction comes in: when the vast majority of playback equipment used by end customers
will be equipped with technology to adjust playback volumes accordingly so that a track with -18 RMS will run
at the same perceived level as a -7 RMS track, *you lose the motivation* for doing this loudness war gamble, simply
because the "reward" is taken away from you. on the contrary, youre going to be punished, because of course
the flat mastered -7 RMS track will then have no level advantage anymore, but still no dynamics, so it will sound
like crap in comparison to the -18 RMS track (i.e. your supertramp example)
when that becomes the standard (and one can be optimistic that thats soon gonna be the case), loud mastering will simply
be counterproductive. its gonna make your mix sound bad in context with other mixes that are more dynamic.
i happens already now. many media players already do it, and on the radio, quieter masterings sound at least less bad
than loud masterings because theyre only squashed to death once (by the radio stations optimods multiband limiting)
and not twice (during mastering PLUS by the radio stations optimod).
| zolo wrote: |
Nothing in normalization/compression/limiting will add dynamics where none existed originally.
No device can properly restore dynamic range crushed in mixing/mastering. |
no of course not. none of this will bring back the lost dynamics on mastered-to-death recordings
of our time. nothing can. im strictly speaking about this equipment taking away the motivation to master
"loud" in the first place in the future.
| zolo wrote: |
This entire concept of returning to the use of dynamics in audio (pre-1986) must be an industry wide focus re-sold to the consumer as the latest improvement in dynamic digital technology or it will never happen. |
but thats my point: thats not going to happen. the industry is not united enough to do this, mastering engineers are in a too competitive
market for it to happen (stop doing loud masters and the customers will go to some other place - ive seen it happen with colleagues),
and quite frankly, the customer himself is not nearly interested enough in this topic. its only in rare cases when a record is
mastered to death in a really insane way (i.e. the already now infamous last metallica record) that *some* people react, but even
then i would argue thats only a small nerdy minority. the vast majority knows nothing about these concerns, theyre completely
unaware of the topic and if at all, they usually fall for the psychoacoustic trick of the louder mastering so if they have a thought
at all, its likely that they think of the louder CD being the better CD.
thats why i think only the advancement in technology that ultimately will start to "punish" loud masters automatically will
eventually trigger the needed change in mastering culture. were not going to be saved by reasonable audio engineers.
there are simply not enough of those ;-) were going to be saved by advancements in technology that play to joe averages
interest of having his media player play all music at the same perceived volume. when that technology sits in the majority
of devices people use to listen to music, there will be no more motivation to make loud records. the deal will change from
"i sacrifice amount X of dynamic range for perceived level advantage Y" to "i sacrifice amount X of dynamic range and
get nothing in return because all media players simply turn me down accordingly by default", therefore people will
stop doing this BS.
now more clear what i mean? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zolo Senior Member
Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Posts: 2262 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Derek wrote: | | ...now more clear what i mean? |
Yes, I understand where you're coming from.
The main difference seems to be that you think most people will be a hard sell, with people essentially needing to be coerced to succumb to futility via limits built into technology over a period of time.
I think it simply takes a mindset to promote the value of using dynamic range again.
The proponents of crush are those building the hardware/software designed to do it, and those convinced that "brutal power" requires it.
Looking back, I'd say the TC Finalizer hardware and then Waves Ultramaximizer software brought crush to the forefront of audio in the past 10 years.
I remember an album by the founder of Strapping Young Lad about 10 years ago that was so crushed it basically drove the guy to a nervous breakdown while self-producing it... Listening to the album left me with a feeling of a hangover without the fun in getting there. ;-) _________________ • N5 w/NEK • DD/SE • RME HDSP9652 • HDSPe Madi • Micstasy M • Asus P5Q • Q9300 • 4GB DDR2 • UAD2 Quad • Win XP/32 • Win7/64 • Custom RME TotalMix Skins |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Derek Senior Member
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 1542
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| zolo wrote: |
I think it simply takes a mindset to promote the value of using dynamic range again.
|
but that has been tried many times before and it has never worked. dont get me wrong, i applaud the initiative, always do. its just that
ive seen too many of these initiatives coming and going without anything happening really. apparently people in our industry simply
arent mature enough for an industry wide "peace treaty" - the problem is well known, hated by everybody and its been here for
more than ten years now (actually a kind of loudness race already started in the vinyl days, but that was more due to the limitations
of the medium itself - the digital insanity started somewhere in the mid nineties when cd masterings increasingly crossed the line between
reasonable dense masterings and just plain broken limiter orgys), and here we are approaching 2010 and nothing has changed.
therefore i believe its gonna be the technology that will have to take care of this.
lets look at it this way: were both optimistic enough to see an end for this loudness race happening one way or the other. thats all that counts :-) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LordNibbler Senior Member
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 1268
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am not at all optimistic the loudness war will ever end. Let me try and explain.
There have been three technologies that have run in parallel with each other over the last ~15 years or so - loudness maximising, abundant digital copies and home cinema. The first two together have become essential fuel for the "ipod" boom and the ipod boom has shaped the way people listen to music. Music is no longer a feature in our lives, it is now an accompianement, part of the background noise which the ipod serves very well. Due to the environments most ipods are used in, loud masters work better than more dynamic masters and critical listening isn't possible, nor desired. As long as these conditions exist and continue to grow, fewer and fewer people are going to be listening in more traditional ways (putting a CD on the deck and sitting down to listen to it) so the demand for dynamic masters gets smaller and smaller.
Where home cinema fits into this is that it has replaced the "physical experience" that people used to get when listening to hi-fi. People are now critical of their home cinema setups and tune them carefully to maximise the sonic impact. Where as previously, the pure fun of listening to good sound came from the hi-fi, now it comes from DVD - loud explosions, surround sound, etc.. The audio-visual experience of film has pushed music aside. The ipod has further reduced music to a background noise and loud masters are better for this.
The industry and domestic momentum behind these changes is too large to stop or even slow down. Just look at the way hi-fi manufacturers have had to diversify into home cinema just to survive. Look at the way CD "remasters" come out every few years, each one louder than the previous, each one a cheap excuse to get people to buy the CD yet again (when they invariably sound far worse than the first generation). Look at the sales figures for ipod players vs simple but quality home replay systems. It's probably 100:1.
In this environment, how on earth is the loudness war going to be stopped? It would have to be a cataclysmic event to stop it and undo all the damage. I hate to be living in the era when high quality recordings with proper dynamics became consigned to the history books but painful as that is, I have to accept it has happened. There is no way this is all going to be unravelled. It's gone. Take care of all those old CDs and LPs because that era of sound has passed.
LN _________________ Nuendo 4
XP SP3, H8DCE, Opteron 285, 3GB, LynxTWO-A, XFX nVidia 6600, 2xNEC2180, OCZ SSD, Highpoint RAID, UAD-1, UAD-2 Quad, RemoteSL, Faderport
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Derek Senior Member
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 1542
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i fully agree with your "diagnosis". yet, my source of hope lies directly in your post as well - the primary playback device these days is the ipod (or, more general, some sort
of audio file playing device, i.e. the ipod is already on its way out, soon to be replaced by "whatever mobile phone you happen to have" with all of them having 8 GB upwards).
that means, the mechanism that is playing back the music is at its core a media playing software. and yes, the primary use is playing back more or less random playlists
out of huge mp3 collections.
again, heres where my optimism comes in: if there is ONE thing joe average notices about "audio fidelity", its the constant and extreme changes in playback volume
when your media player plays frank sinatras "my way" right after some linkin park production. people hate this problem, even joe avrage is annoyed by this.
and its a problem that is easily solved via technology, already now many media players have this. that ALL of them have this and have it activated by default (important because joe average would never consciously change the settings in his media player) is really just a question of time IMO.
and then, doing a loud master will be "punished" sonically. that mp3 players are designed to have you listen to your music loud in loud environments doesnt have
anything to do with it - listening to stuff at high volume makes the media players ability to know a tracks RMS level all the more important. the development leads
to future mp3 players that 1. can playback music at high volumes but 2. dont control these volumes in dumb absolute parameters but based on a RMS readout.
and be it only for health reasons. i.e. my country has strict health regulations regarding the maximum potential playback volume, so a mp3 maker really only
has the choice of either making a "dumb" mp3player that doesnt know the RMS level of the audio files it plays back and thus has to ship it with a "safety buffer"
regarding the absolute volume, leading to a mp3player that would be considered a "quiet mp3player" by teenagers. nobody wants those.
so already by this dynamic, manufacturers of mp3 players are automatically lead to build more intelligence into their mp3players.
for all the wrong reasons, but who cares :-)
so, there wont be a cataclysmic event. just the mechanisms of the market and technological advance that will make loud masterings first obsolete and then counterproductive.
and then - and only then - will the loudness war end.
and if we want to do anything about this, i personally wouldnt go to audiophile initiatives (that everybody can agree on, only to then get back to ignoring them),
but i would go to manufacturers like microsoft and apple. make a petition that they ship their media players 1. with RMS detection and 2. with the according volume
adjustment mechanism *activated by default*. you can make a very convincing case about why they should do this (convenience for joe average, and its a super easy
fix to a problem *everybody* can relate to)
have sucess there and BANG, you have already made loud masters completely obsolete on, i dunno, probably 80% of the market (when you include the 40% of
radio listening where loud masterings have been obsolete already for a long time). that seems a lot more effective to me. and then its only a question of time
until people realize how much theyre doing themselves a disservice, when their loud masters sound worse not only on the radio but also when played back through
itunes or the windows media player etc. this is just a question of "reaching critical mass" until the majority of mastering engineers will see themselves forced to
react accordingly.
if there is a way out of this at all, this is the only way IMO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Derek Senior Member
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 1542
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
btw, one of the reasons why im so convinced about this is my own car stereo, which came with exactly such a RMS based "auto volume", and it was set to on.
its awesome, because really all tracks playback by about the same perceived volume. very very nice. and indeed, flat limited masters dont stick out at all anymore there, on the
contrary, they sound kind of pale in comparison. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vocalpoint Member
Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Posts: 765 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Derek wrote: | | So, there wont be a cataclysmic event. just the mechanisms of the market and technological advance that will make loud masterings first obsolete and then counterproductive. And then - and only then - will the loudness war end. |
Don't so naive - for every MP3 player that would "punish" a loud master - there will be 3 more for sale each day that will use a tag line like "Don't be robbed of the true dynamics of your music by using the Apple Volume Limiting iPod - buy Product XYZ that allows your music to be heard!".
Also - if the technology comes to a point where the record companies become truly annoyed that "their" music cannot be sold to be played at "full" volume - there will be some other delivery device, mechanism, fornat etc - that will ensure nothing can be compromised. If you actually believe that the MP3 is the end of the line for delivery - for all time...it won't be.
Your "punish the loud master" prediction sounds eerily like DRM technologies that were a prime example of "limiting" something - in that case - it was the freedom of playback. It's human nature - as soon as any barrier (of any kind) begins to intrude on the "experience" - (whatever that might be) - people will immediately be looking to find the next best thing that does not contain said barrier. And if there is a dollar to be made - people will line up to sell it to you.
There is simply too much money and power at stake here to even attempt to "punish" anything - espeically those who make ipods, phones or whatever. Do you really believe that they would build in anything that even remotely hinder sales? It would be suicide.
| Derek wrote: | | In this environment, how on earth is the loudness war going to be stopped? |
When people stop buying and stop listening to "new" music because it sounds like crap - then the war will be over. As soon as the "skim" is effected enough - things will begin to change. And it's already well on it's way with vinyl. Many are returning to that medium since it's physical form does not allow "loudness". Starting this year -unless it's a genre that respects the music like jazz or classical - all my "new" purchases are in the vinyl format. I have never enjoyed my music more. No "tired" listening sessions and blaring F***in volume making me crazy. _________________ Bruce McDonald | Nuendo v4.2.x |Vocalpoint Studios Canada | System Specs| |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HHaynes Member
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 753 Location: Hollywood, CA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is a very dynamic discussion. I give it 60dB from nominal to peak _________________ Houston Haynes - Titan Line Music - LPHovercraft
Mac Pro "Blackintosh" - OSX 10.6.4 - Intel i7 920 - 12GB RAM - 64GB SSD [boot/app] - RME Fireface 400 - SmartAV Tango + Extension Bay
"Arguing on the Internet is like entering a dance contest with the Macarena. You might win, but you're still going to look like an idiot." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zolo Senior Member
Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Posts: 2262 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Houston has opened the door for S/N and Crosstalk analogies...
the main disadvantages of Vocalpoints vinyl ressurection.
It's all a compromise... as long as apathy eclipses action. _________________ • N5 w/NEK • DD/SE • RME HDSP9652 • HDSPe Madi • Micstasy M • Asus P5Q • Q9300 • 4GB DDR2 • UAD2 Quad • Win XP/32 • Win7/64 • Custom RME TotalMix Skins |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SafeandSound Senior Member
Joined: 09 Mar 2005 Posts: 2634 Location: London UK
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I actually think vinyl sound sucks.
It's good for 20 plays and then you have loads of distortion.
Well recorded, mastered 24 bit audio dithered to CD is pretty good sounding.
Vinyl has a physical experience associated with it but it sounds pretty dire quite
quickly.
After reading this I don't think there is much hope for less loudness maximization. _________________ N4.2 ,XP Pro, ASUS, Plextor, PMC IB1's, BM6P, SADiE V5, WL5, PTLE7.3.
Free previews, low cost, professional mastering.
http://www.masteringmastering.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Musicbynumbers Member
Joined: 10 Nov 2007 Posts: 193 Location: Brighton, UK
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The public "want" what the public "get" ; ) not the other way around a lot of the time..
.
This is a worthy cause as it's not really about the general public it's about all us guys who loved music the way it was.. Dynamic! ; )
.
And i agree, vinyl is not really the way forward.. More of a psycho-acoustic "baby blanket" to help us remember our youth ; ) _________________ Nuendo 4.2 asus p5w dh, q6600 @2.66ghz, 4 gig ddr2, raid 10 (internal), ati x1900 + ati x1300 (1 main lcd + 3x8inch touchscreens). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
commandcom Member
Joined: 20 Mar 2005 Posts: 233 Location: Madrid, Spain
|
Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm with Derek!
Very good points, really.
You've sumarized with ease the same (but vague) ideas that I've had for quite some time.
I really think that he's right, just because he's refeering to a very basic and human habit: Take the easiest way.
And yes, auto-volume is the easiest way!
My only concern, being agree with that, is that it WILL extend to home cinema and kill (simple paradox here) all dynamics in movie sound! (home released, obviously) _________________ Main DAW: N4 / Reason4 / XP PRO SP2 / QuadCore Q6600 2.4Ghz / 2x1TB Raid0 SATA / 2x1TB LaCie FW800 / NVidia - IntensityPro / Motu828 / MicroExpress / MCU / ZeroSL / Axiom61 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vocalpoint Member
Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Posts: 765 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SafeandSound wrote: | | Vinyl has a physical experience associated with it but it sounds pretty dire quite quickly. |
Actually - many of today's CD's sound "dire" as soon as the play button is pressed for the first time. I have one Rush album that only made it thru two tracks - ever - before becoming my favorite coffee coaster.
I hope you have had a chance to experience well cut vinyl on a finely crafted turntable before making your mind up - because your statement couldn't be farther from the truth. _________________ Bruce McDonald | Nuendo v4.2.x |Vocalpoint Studios Canada | System Specs| |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BIG8 Senior Member
Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Posts: 1195 Location: BEIJING, P.R. CHINA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Safe&Sound, being in the UK, did you get the chance to audition top notch British engineered turntables of the likes of Linn Sondek or Roksan Xerxes, mounted with an SME pick-up and a decent MC cartridge (Audio Technica or Sure) through good amps and speakers in a well treated room?
Well kept records do not distort that easily. You've got to abuse them and lend them to others for that :)
I never stop being amazed by the sound of vinyl. There is something about orchestral stuff which give me goose pimples... never could get that effect from digital, but I don't know if that has more to do with the carelessness of recent recording than anything else.
Cheers, _________________ Hovannes (Jean) ISMIRLIAN
N4.2, XP pro SP2 in:
1)GA-E35P-DS4, Q6600, GeIl 2x2G DDR800, SaphireHD2600XT, FFace800
2) IBM T41, PentiumM 1.6GHz & 1G DDR333 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zolo Senior Member
Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Posts: 2262 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BIG8 wrote: | ...I never stop being amazed by the sound of vinyl. There is something about orchestral stuff which give me goose pimples... never could get that effect from digital, but I don't know if that has more to do with the carelessness of recent recording than anything else.
|
That a well balanced needle in the groove is like a bow on the strings... it breathes. ;-)
Reminds me of the last days of Vinyl Hi-Fi in 1986... 12" singles played at 45 RPM to improve the groove depth, spacing, and fidelity.
It's that warmth we've been seeking to emulate for the past 20 years.
This loudness issue might not change, but it doesn't have to be because we never tried. _________________ • N5 w/NEK • DD/SE • RME HDSP9652 • HDSPe Madi • Micstasy M • Asus P5Q • Q9300 • 4GB DDR2 • UAD2 Quad • Win XP/32 • Win7/64 • Custom RME TotalMix Skins |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BIG8 Senior Member
Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Posts: 1195 Location: BEIJING, P.R. CHINA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| zolo wrote: | | BIG8 wrote: |
It's that warmth we've been seeking to emulate for the past 20 years.
|
|
Funny, I wouldn't describe that sound as 'warm' :-)
strictly classical and opera recordings of the 70s: at every orchestral climax, the crunch and sudden dynamic surge is so.... emotional, gave me goose pimples back then. Can not get this effect on recent classical /opera CDs, where I find the 'crunch' being smeared, warmer? and the dynamics er.... flat?
(edited to fix the quote)
Cheers, _________________ Hovannes (Jean) ISMIRLIAN
N4.2, XP pro SP2 in:
1)GA-E35P-DS4, Q6600, GeIl 2x2G DDR800, SaphireHD2600XT, FFace800
2) IBM T41, PentiumM 1.6GHz & 1G DDR333
Last edited by BIG8 on Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:21 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|